One important lesson I learned while working with spatio-temporal graph data on the METR-LA dataset during my Executive Masters open-book assignment:
Do not keep switching between Claude, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and other LLMs or AI tools during the execution stage. This lesson has repeated itself in the two years throughout the Executive Masters whenever we have been allowed to use LLMs.
My learning:
โข Different LLMs reason differently
โข They are trained and fine-tuned differently
โข They suggest different libraries, assumptions, fixes, and coding styles
โข Mixing their guidance during debugging can create unnecessary chaos
โข What looks like โmore intelligenceโ can become โmore confusionโ
โข Multi-model thinking is useful during brainstorming
โข It helps in debating, exploring, comparing, and expanding ideas
โข But once execution begins, consistency matters more than variety
โข Pick one model and work through the problem step by step
โข Ask it to explain, debug, simplify, correct, and iterate
โข Stay with one reasoning path until the solution stabilizes
My conclusion:
Use multiple LLMs for exploration.
Use one LLM for execution.
Mixing models during ideation can create insight.
Mixing models during implementation can create chaos.
This is especially true in technical work involving data science, graph ML, spatio-temporal modeling, package dependencies, tensor shapes, runtime environments, and debugging.
Progress comes from disciplined iteration, not tool-hopping.
Note: Enhanced / compiled with help of AI / LLMs
- Email me: Neil@HarwaniSytems.in
- Website: www.HarwaniSystems.in
- Blog: www.TechAndTrain.com/blog
- LinkedIn: Neil Harwani | LinkedIn


You must be logged in to post a comment.